RE: [-empyre-] C. S. Peirce and Code

["Frederic Madre" <fmadre@free.fr>]

> Charles Baldwin
> 
> It is nice to have a technology that is porous to the network in ways
> never achieved before.

sure.
so, besides getting more hits (which I do not care about at all) did anybody
find an enjoyable (let alone useful) way to use trackbacks (for example) ?

> Suppose F is correct: The difference would be that the blog seems to
> take care of the linking automatically (per Adrian: supports 
> trackback,
> cannot write links in, etc.), whereas the citationality of "war an
> peace" (or other language) seems non-hypertextual, non-networked,
> non-automatic, not celebrating Bataillian excess (but why? is that
> true?). Or: the blog is somehow more automatic, more networked, etc.
> (Magically so, or technologically so - same thing in this case.) So,
> this is why we have these words to describe blogs (exciting, novel,
> emergent), so we know the difference and can identify the magic we
> believe in today, so we don't confuse the results for what language
> already did (at last the general economy, we might declare), and so we
> can remind ourselves this is something new.

this is so gently put that for a moment I can also revel into this magic
which, unfortunately, has escaped now from my experience of blogs, and I
thank you for this moment
(now gone)

> Sandy

the magic name of Charles Baldwin ?

f.
ps: my/our blog http://2balles.cc